You are not logged in.


Dear visitor, welcome to Staedter Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

Attention: The last reply to this post was 463 days ago. The thread may already be out of date. Please consider creating a new thread.

Message information

Automatically converts internet addresses into links by adding [url] and [/url] around them.

Smiley code in your message such as :) is automatically displayed as image.

You can use BBCode to format your message, if this option is enabled.

Add attachments

Maximum number of attachments: 5
Maximum file size: 150 kB
Allowed file extensions: bmp, gif, jpeg, jpg, pdf, png, txt, zip


One possible answer per row - a maximum of 20 answers

Security measure

Please enter the letters that are shown in the picture below (without spaces, and upper or lower case can be used). If you cannot identify the captcha even after reloading it please contact the administrator of this site.

The last 2 posts


Wednesday, March 14th 2018, 4:47pm

By berlin


Höchstrichterlich wurde jetzt entschieden, dass es bei "Kunde" bleibt (genbumsdings masculinum).


Tuesday, March 13th 2018, 9:20am

By berlin

Grammatik Männin

Bei Moma (Morgenmagazin)läuft gerade die Diskussion, ob Kunden mit Kunde oder Kundin angesprochen werden sollen. Natürlich eine weltbewegende Frage. :P

Mein Vorschlag: Verwendet "Person", das umfasst alle. Natürlich ist die Person weiblich, die nächste Diskriminierung! Himmel, Ärschin und Zwirn/In, dann nehmt einheitlich die weibliche Form Frau Gisbert Britz. Hauptsache, die Post kommt an.

Beamtinnen dürfen wählen, ob sie zur Postamtsfrau oder zu Postamtsmännin befördert werden.